History Podcasts

Has there ever arisen a nation-state without violence/war/extreme subordination?

Has there ever arisen a nation-state without violence/war/extreme subordination?

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Has there ever arisen a nation-state (building/birth/creation of a new nation state) without violence/war/extreme subordination? But rather peacefully, organically, with all parties and neighbours being enthusiastic?

Iceland would probably count. It left its union with Denmark in 1918 at the end of a peaceful independence movement. However, it continued to share Denmark's king as head of state until 1944, when Nazi occupation of Denmark made that problematic.

The Icelandic independence movement was peaceful from its start in the post-Napoleonic period to the accomplishment of independence in 1944. Common explanations for the peaceful nature of Iceland's independence struggle include:

  • Iceland's distance to Copenhagen.
  • Iceland's homogenous population.
  • The accommodating responses of Denmark to Icelandic demands.
  • The unwillingness of Denmark to respond violently, in part due to a respect for Icelandic culture but also an unwillingness to shoulder the costs of quelling the Icelandic independence movement.
  • The peaceful trends in the Nordic region after the Napoleonic Wars.

I'd include the partition of Czechoslovakia into the Czech Republic and Slovakia. According to Wikipedia,

The separation occurred without violence, and was thus said to be "velvet", much like the "Velvet Revolution" that preceded it, which was accomplished through massive peaceful demonstrations and actions. In contrast, other post-communist break-ups (such as the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia) involved violent conflict. Czechoslovakia is the only former Eastern bloc state to have an entirely peaceful breakup.

Watch the video: Noam Chomsky - The Nation State (June 2022).


  1. Mikacage

    Sorry for my interfering ... I understand that question. We can examine.

  2. Vudozilkree

    I'm sorry, but I think you are making a mistake. I can prove it. Email me at PM.

  3. Barton

    Your sentence simply excellent

  4. Edmond

    I am very sorry that I cannot help you with anything. But I am sure that you will find the right solution. Do not despair.

Write a message